U.S. Envoy Urges Caution on Forces for Afghanistan
by Elisabeth Bumiller and Mark Landler
The New York Times
November 11, 2009
" WASHINGTON — The United States ambassador to Afghanistan, who once served as the top American military commander there,
has expressed in writing his reservations about deploying additional troops to the country, three senior American
officials said Wednesday."
(full article)
SHARED INTERESTS DEFINE OBAMA'S WORLD
In engaging adversaries, the President sometimes unsettles allies
By Scott Wilson
The Washington Post
Monday, November 2, 2009
"... President Obama is applying the same tools to international diplomacy that he once used as a community organizer
on Chicago's South Side, constructing appeals to shared interests and attempting to bring the government's conduct in line
with its ideals.
Obama's approach to the world as a community of nations, more alike than different in outlook and interest,
has elevated America's standing abroad and won him the Nobel Peace Prize. But on the farthest-reaching U.S. foreign policy
challenges, he is struggling to translate his own popularity into American influence, even with allies that have celebrated
his break from the Bush administration's emphasis on military strength, unilateral action and personal chemistry ..."
(full article)
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT AT THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL SUMMIT ON NUCLEAR
NON-PROLIFERATION AND NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT
United Nations Headquarters
New York, New York
September 24, 2009
"... Today, the Security Council endorsed a global effort to lock down all vulnerable nuclear materials
within four years. The United States will host a summit next April to advance this goal and help all nations
achieve it. This resolution will also help strengthen the institutions and initiatives that combat the
smuggling, financing, and theft of proliferation-related materials. It calls on all states to freeze any
financial assets that are being used for proliferation. And it calls for stronger safeguards to reduce the
likelihood that peaceful nuclear weapons programs can be diverted to a weapons program ..."
(full article)
OBAMA'S YOUTHFUL IDEALS SHAPED THE LONG ARC OF HIS NUCLEAR-FREE VISION
By William J. Broad and Davide E. Sanger
The New York Times
July 5, 2009
In the depths of the cold war, in 1983, a senior at Columbia University wrote in a campus newsmagazine, Sundial,
about the vision of "a nuclear free world." He railed against discussions of "first- versus second-strike capabilities"
that "suit the military-industrial interests" with their "billion-dollar erector sets," and agitated for the elimination
of global arsenals holding tens of thousands of deadly warheads.
(full article)
U.S. AND RUSSIA SEEK MORE EXTENSIVE WEAPONS CUTS
By Jonathan Weisman
Wall Street Journal
July 1, 2009
WASHINGTON -- The U.S. and Russia are expected to launch new talks aimed at reducing the number of
and other nuclear weapons on both sides, a senior Obama administration official said Tuesday, in an ambitious
effort that could help ease bilateral tensions over other issues as well.
(full article)
NORTH KOREA, IRAN, AND THE END OF NUCLEAR DETERRENCE
By Tad Daley
Common Dreams
June 26, 2009
Co-authored by Kevin Martin, Executive Director of Peace Action
When South Korean President Lee Myung-bak visited Washington for a summit with President Barack Obama on June 16th,
the United States reaffirmed its "commitment of extended deterrence" to Seoul, "including the U.S. nuclear umbrella."
In response, on June 25th, the 59th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War, North Korea vowed to continue to
expand its nuclear arsenal, to deliver a "fire shower of nuclear retaliation" in response to U.S. "provocations," and
insisted that the nuclear umbrella statement only "provides us with a stronger justification to have a nuclear deterrent."
(full article)
TAKING NORTH KOREA AT THEIR WORD
By Tad Daley
Common Dreams
May 27, 2009
Pyongyang has consistently said that its nuclear weapons are intended to deter aggression. And, indeed, they do.
Shortly after North Korea exploded its second nuclear device in three years on Monday morning, it released
a statement explaining why. "The republic has conducted another underground nuclear testing successfully in
order to strengthen our defensive nuclear deterrence." If the Obama Administration hopes to dissuade Pyongyang
from the nuclear course it seems so hell bent on pursuing ...
(full article)
HOUSE BACKS OBAMA'S AFGHAN SURGE, AMID CALLS FOR EXIT STRATEGY
By John Nichols
The Nation Blogs / The Beat
May 14, 2009
"Sometimes great presidents make mistakes," declared Massachusetts Congressman Jim McGovern as he announced
his intention to vote against $97 billion in "emergency" supplemental funding for the continued U.S. occupation
of Iraq and President Obama's dangerously misguided plan to surge 21,000 more U.S. troops and trainers into
Afghanistan ...
(full article)
EX-US SEC STATE URGES REPUBLICANS TO BACK TEST BAN
By Charles J. Hanley
AP
April 17, 2009
The latest U.S. nuclear showdown doesn't involve any foreign enemy. Instead, it pits President Barack Obama against his Defense Secretary, Robert Gates, and concerns the question...
(full article)
OBAMA'S NUCLEAR CHALLENGE
By Jonathan Schelll
The Nation
April 15, 2009
"So today, I state clearly and with conviction America's commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons,"
President Obama said at the open-air rally in Prague on April 5. With these words came a change in the global air, as if a window had
been opened a crack in a dark room that had been sealed shut for decades. ...
(full article)
HOW FEASIBLE IS OBAMA'S NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT AGENDA?
By Lawrence Wittner
History News Network
April 20, 2009
Not since Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, decades ago, talked of abolishing nuclear weapons
has an American president pledged to work toward that goal. ...
(full article)
283 BASES, 170,000 PIECES OF EQUIPMENT, 140,000 TROOPS, AND AN ARMY OF MERCENARIES: THE LOGISTICAL NIGHTMARE IN IRAQ
By Jeremy Scahill
AlterNet
March 30, 2009
With last week's announced escalation of the war in Afghanistan, including an Iraq-like "surge" replete with 4,000 more U.S. troops and a sizable increase in private contractors...
(full article)
OBAMA'S NUCLEAR WAR
By Mark Thompson
Time
January 26, 2009
The latest U.S. nuclear showdown doesn't involve any foreign enemy. Instead, it pits President Barack Obama against his Defense Secretary, Robert Gates, and concerns the question...
(full article)
VISION FOR A NEW FOREIGN POLICY
By Cora Weiss
The Nation
January 6, 2009
Peace activist Cora Weiss delivered this speech at the 28th annual Conference for Peace sponsored by the New Jersey Coalition for Peace Action at Princeton University November 16, 2008...
(full article)
BUSH: ONLY TIME WILL TELL ABOUT HIS LEGACY
By Carolyn Lochhead
San Francisco Chronicle
January 4, 2009
Love him or hate him, George W. Bush leaves office among the most consequential presidents in modern history. Like his home state of Texas, his presidency was big...
(full article)
ISRAEL'S ENDGAME
By John Barry
Newsweek
December 29, 2008
The attack on Gaza shows that the Olmert government feels it may be running out of options. Does the Gaza offensive signal that the Israeli government has decided to embark...
(full article)
OBAMA NEEDS A PROTEST MOVEMENT
By Frances Fox Piven
The Nation
November 15, 2008
The astonishing election of 2008 is over. Whatever else the future holds, the unchallenged domination of American national government by big business and the political right has been broken...
(full article)
WE HAVE THE MONEY — IF ONLY WE DIDN'T WASTE IT ON THE DEFENSE BUDGET
By Chalmers Johnson
Tom Dispatch
September 29, 2008
There has been much moaning, air-sucking, and outrage about the $700 billion that the U.S. government is thinking of throwing away on rich New York bankers...
(full article)
NUCLEAR BAN? START WITH U.S.
By Lawrence S. Wittner
Times Union
August 3, 2008
The world's nine nuclear powers continue to cling to some 27,000 nuclear weapons, almost all of them more deadly than that first atomic bomb...
(full article)
Grassroots Actions for Peace
Members of Schenectady Neighbors for Peace, a branch of Upper Hudson Peace
Action, and their allies at Women Against War recently hosted their own
"I Miss America" pageant. "Miss Led" "Miss Appropriation" and "Miss Take"
all competed for the crown while drawing attention to what they missed about
America, like fair play and honesty. Supporters handed out materials about
how they missed good ol' American values like functioning democracy and
responsible spending.
Contact Congress
New York State has four new representatives –
all of whom are tepidly to adamantly against the war. This brings New York
State’s total up to 18 congress people mostly against the war, 3 who
are on the fence and 8 who support it. Peace Action of New York State is
organizing a huge campaign to coordinate visits in all of New York’s
29 districts to turn election time anti-war rhetoric into results. We also
need to monitor work on nuclear proliferation, Iran, and cooperation with
the world community to eliminate torture and small arms sales to human rights
abusing countries.
Contact
the 111th Congress
4 things you can do to help
end the war in Iraq
1. Write letters to the editor of your local newspaper
about the war and an exit strategy.
2. Gather signatures for our People's Petition for an
Iraq Peace Process.
Download here
3. Call, e-mail or write your Senators and Congress people.
4. Volunteer
with Peace Action New York State to go on legislative visits, help with
protest campaigns, distribute literature and sponsor movie nights about
the Iraq war.
Act Now!
SUPPORT THE CHILD SOLDIER PREVENTION ACT OF
2007 (S. 1175)
Limit US Military Assistance to Governments Using Child Soldiers
Today, an estimated 250,000 children are serving in armed conflict in 20
countries around the world. These "child soldiers" include boys and girls,
sometimes as young as eight years old, serving in government armies, government-linked
militias, and armed opposition groups. They serve in all aspects of contemporary
warfare-as spies, messengers, guards, cooks, porters, security officers,
and too often, as front-line combatants. Many female child soldiers are
forced to serve as sex slaves or "wives" of military commanders.
Although many child soldiers are found in non-governmental armed opposition
groups, the State Department reports that governments in ten countries are
implicated in child soldier use. The US government provides military assistance
to nine of them.
Some of these governments recruit children into their own armed forces,
while others are directly linked to militias that use children in warfare.
They include: Afghanistan, Burundi, Chad, Colombia, Cote d'Ivoire, Democratic
Republic of Congo, Sri Lanka, Sudan, and Uganda. US military assistance
to these countries ranges from small amounts of funding for military training
to hundreds of millions in weapons, training, and military financing. US
tax dollars should not be used to support the exploitation of children as
soldiers. Moreover, US weapons should not end up in the hands of children.
The Child Soldier Prevention Act (S1175) is bipartisan legislation introduced
by Senators Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Sam Brownback (R-KS). The bill would
restrict five categories of US military assistance (International Military
Education and Training, Foreign Military Financing, Foreign Military Sales,
Direct Commercial Sales, and Excess Defense Articles) to governments described
above until they end any involvement in the recruitment or use of child
soldiers. The bill would not automatically cut off these military assistance
programs; governments taking concrete steps to end child recruitment and
demobilize child soldiers would remain eligible for assistance directed
solely towards the professionalization of their forces for up to two years
before any prohibition on assistance would be imposed.
This bill will provide clear incentives for governments currently implicated
in the recruitment and use of child soldiers to end this practice and demobilize
children from their forces. It also encourages the United States to expand
funding to rehabilitate former child soldiers and work with the international
community to bring to justice rebel armed groups that kidnap children for
use as soldiers.
Help Stop the Use of Child Soldiers:
Write a letter to your Members of Congress urging them to co-sponsor
the Child Soldier Prevention Act of 2007.
Click
here to send a letter now!
Watch
a short 4-minute video for more information
—Encourage organizations you are involved with to endorse the legislation
—Urge your local newspaper and radio/television news programs to do
a story about child soldiers
—Share information about the bill with your friends, classmates and
colleagues
Learn more, click on the links below:
About
the Child Soldier Prevention Act
About
child soldiers
Tips for Successful Legislative Meetings
Meeting in person with elected officials and/or legislative staff is
the most effective means of political advocacy. Here are some important
"do's" and "don'ts" to ensure that your lobbying meeting is successful and
effective.
Do:
Make an appointment in advance. Time is always at a premium
in legislative offices. Contact the legislator's scheduler in advance to
arrange a meeting. Call the office or check the legislator's website to
find out how the meeting request should be made - by fax, e-mail or in writing.
Follow up with a phone call or two, requests sometimes get lost. Be clear
about who will be attending the meeting and the specific reason for the
meeting. Legislative schedules are unpredictable so don't be put off if
your meeting is rescheduled or if you have to meet with staff in lieu of
the elected official.
Your homework. Prepare carefully and thoroughly for your
meeting. Take the time to "know" your legislator by reviewing past votes
or statements on the issue, his/her party's position, and committee assignments.
Develop an agenda that all your participants clearly understand. Know your
talking points in advance and be prepared to make your case. Research the
opposition's arguments against your position and, if possible, acknowledge
and rebut those arguments in your presentation.
Dress Well. What you wear can convey how seriously you
take the meeting. It is important to wear clean, and neat clothing. Slacks,
skirts, button down shirts and blazers are appropriate. Teeshirts with text,
jeans, flipflops, tank tops and other casual clothing should be left at
home. Stay "on message." Effective legislative meetings should be narrow
in scope. Stick to a single issue, state only a few key points in support
of your position and make a definite request for action. Many meetings are
ineffective because a participant brings up other issues or strays from
the key arguments supporting your position. Have a message and stick to
it.
Go local. Your effectiveness is based on geography. Legislators
want to hear your thoughts and opinions because you are a constituent. One
of your most useful strategies is to relate the issue and your position
to your community. Legislators have many other avenues to get national or
state analysis, reports and statistics. Local statistics and stories are
important and you can be the only source for such rich information. Don't
be afraid to humanize the issue by relating it to your local community or
personal experience.
Make a clear, actionable request. Many people are afraid
that it's impolite to make a direct request. But, don't forget that the
purpose of your meeting is to secure support for your issue. It is appropriate
and expected that you will make a request at your meeting. The key is to
make sure that your request is clearly articulated and actionable by the
legislator. Keep in mind that your request should be timely and consistent
with the legislative process. It is usually not enough to ask for generic
support for an issue or cause, rather make a direct and specific request
that is tied to pending legislative activity (if possible). For example,
ask that a legislator co-sponsor a bill. You should make reference to bill
numbers and be knowledgeable about the status of the bill. Making a specific
request gives you the opportunity to evaluate the legislator's response.
Cultivate a relationship with staff. Many grassroots advocates
underestimate the important role of legislative staff. A supportive staff
person can often make the difference between success and failure. Staff
play an invaluable role in shaping a legislator's agenda and position on
issues. It is important that you make every effort to cultivate a positive
working relationship with staff. Over time, staff may even come to regard
you as a helpful resource for information on your issue.
Follow up. What happens after a meeting is almost as important
as the meeting itself. Send a 'thank you' letter after the meeting that
not only expresses appreciation but reinforces your message and any verbal
commitment of support made by the legislator or staff. If you promise during
the meeting to get back in touch with additional information, be sure that
you do so. Failure to follow up on your promise will call your credibility
into question. Also, don't forget to report the results of your meeting
back to PANYS. This information is vital to coordinating overall legislative
strategy and evaluating the impact of advocacy efforts. Follow-up is important
even if the legislator does not agree to support your request because you
are building a long-term relationship.
Don't:
Go "off-message" or discuss unrelated issues. You must
deliver a unified message during your meeting. Sending different messages
or discussing unrelated subjects will only undermine your ability to secure
support. Limit your advocacy to a single issue. Legislators meet with many
groups and constituents so it is important that your message and request
be clear and uniform.
Engage in partisan critiques. It is best to keep the discussion
based on the merits of the policy or issue. Avoid characterizing your position
in strictly partisan terms. Worse, do not make snide or disparaging partisan
comments. You are working on behalf of an issue, not a party. So, you want
legislators of both parties to support your position. Be careful not to
alienate legislators or staff based on partisanship.
Use threats. While it may be tempting to tell a legislator
who has rebuffed your request that "you'll never vote for him/her again"
or that "you pay his/her salary," such discourtesy only ensures that your
arguments will be discounted-now and in the future.
Be late. Time is a valuable and scare commodity for legislators.
Punctuality conveys professionalism and demonstrates your commitment to
your issue, which is after all the reason for the meeting. Arrive early
and if you are meeting as a group allow time to calm nerves and make a final
review of the talking points and message.
Get too comfortable. Advocates are sometimes surprised
by the courteous reception they receive, even from lawmakers who disagree
with their position. As a constituent you will be accorded respect by the
legislator and staff. Don't mistake this respect for agreement. Don't let
the comfortable nature of the exchange deter you from making your request.
And, don't mistake "concern" for your issue with support for your position.
Forget to follow up. Immediately send a thank you letter.
Stay informed on your issue and track how your legislator responds. Did
the legislator follow through on his/her promise? If not, request an explanation.
If so, express your appreciation.