Twitter YouTube Facebook


Peace Action: Past,
Present, and Future
by Larry Wittner and
Glen Harold Stassen.
On sale now for $15.00
plus shipping and handling


Ban Ki-Moon's Speech at Riverside Church NPT Conference
May 1, 2010>

I know how much energy it takes to speak out, to protest, to carry the banner of this most noble human aspiration - world peace. Let me begin by saying how humbling it is to speak to you in this famous place, Riverside Church.

(full article)

A New Ground Zero

by Ban Ki-Moon
International Herald Tribune (France) [Op-Ed], April 28, 2010

A few weeks ago, traveling in Kazakhstan, I had the sobering experience of standing at Ground Zero. This was the notorious test site at Semipalatinsk, where the Soviet Union detonated 456 nuclear weapons between 1947 and 1989.

(full article)

Reaching Zero

by Jonathan Schell
The Nation, April 9, 2010

What is the purpose, if any, of the nuclear bomb, that brooding presence that has shadowed all human life for sixty-five years? The question has haunted the nuclear age. It may be that no satisfactory answer has ever been given.

(full article)

U.S. Envoy Urges Caution on Forces for Afghanistan
by Elisabeth Bumiller and Mark Landler
The New York Times, November 11, 2009

" WASHINGTON — The United States ambassador to Afghanistan, who once served as the top American military commander there, has expressed in writing his reservations about deploying additional troops to the country, three senior American officials said Wednesday."

(full article)

SHARED INTERESTS DEFINE OBAMA'S WORLD
In engaging adversaries, the President sometimes unsettles allies

By Scott Wilson
The Washington Post, Monday, November 2, 2009

"... President Obama is applying the same tools to international diplomacy that he once used as a community organizer on Chicago's South Side, constructing appeals to shared interests and attempting to bring the government's conduct in line with its ideals.

Obama's approach to the world as a community of nations, more alike than different in outlook and interest, has elevated America's standing abroad and won him the Nobel Peace Prize. But on the farthest-reaching U.S. foreign policy challenges, he is struggling to translate his own popularity into American influence, even with allies that have celebrated his break from the Bush administration's emphasis on military strength, unilateral action and personal chemistry ..."

(full article)

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT AT THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL SUMMIT ON NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION AND NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT

United Nations Headquarters, New York, September 24, 2009

"... Today, the Security Council endorsed a global effort to lock down all vulnerable nuclear materials within four years. The United States will host a summit next April to advance this goal and help all nations achieve it. This resolution will also help strengthen the institutions and initiatives that combat the smuggling, financing, and theft of proliferation-related materials. It calls on all states to freeze any financial assets that are being used for proliferation. And it calls for stronger safeguards to reduce the likelihood that peaceful nuclear weapons programs can be diverted to a weapons program ..."

(full article)

OBAMA'S YOUTHFUL IDEALS SHAPED THE LONG ARC OF HIS NUCLEAR-FREE VISION

By William J. Broad and Davide E. Sanger
The New York Times, July 5, 2009

In the depths of the cold war, in 1983, a senior at Columbia University wrote in a campus newsmagazine, Sundial, about the vision of "a nuclear free world." He railed against discussions of "first- versus second-strike capabilities" that "suit the military-industrial interests" with their "billion-dollar erector sets," and agitated for the elimination of global arsenals holding tens of thousands of deadly warheads.

(full article)

U.S. AND RUSSIA SEEK MORE EXTENSIVE WEAPONS CUTS

By Jonathan Weisman
Wall Street Journal, July 1, 2009
WASHINGTON -- The U.S. and Russia are expected to launch new talks aimed at reducing the number of and other nuclear weapons on both sides, a senior Obama administration official said Tuesday, in an ambitious effort that could help ease bilateral tensions over other issues as well.
(full article)

“Bombplex 2030”
Complex 2030 is the National Nuclear Security Administration’s plan to replace the entire nuclear stockpile with more usable nuclear weapons. The program demands major tax-payer money. Masked in deceptive speech, the plan aims to be the “future of the nuclear weapons complex,” responding to the “changing technical, geopolitical or military needs.” Under the phraseology of “reduction” it aims instead toward a new era of nuclear proliferation. The public scoping period began October 19, 2006 and ends January 17, 2006. For more information go to http://www.nnsa.doe.gov/
North Korea Nuclear Crisis
SOLVING THE KOREAN STALEMATE, ONE STEP AT A TIME
With the risk of war on the Korean Peninsula, there was a consensus that the forces of South Korea and the United States could overwhelmingly defeat North Korea. But it was also known that North Korea could quickly launch more than 20,000 shells and missiles into nearby Seoul. The American commander in South Korea, Gen. Gary Luck, estimated that total casualties would far exceed those of the Korean War. (cont'd)
IN A TEST, A REASON TO TALK BILATERAL DIPLOMACY COULD STILL ROLL BACK NORTH KOREA'S NUCLEAR ARMS EFFORT
Paradoxical as it may seem, Pyongyang staged the test as a last-ditch effort to jump-start a bilateral dialogue on the normalization of relations that the United States has so far spurned. Over and over, I was told that Pyongyang wants bilateral negotiations to set the stage for implementation of the denuclearization agreement it concluded in Beijing on Sept. 19, 2005, with the United States, China, Russia, Japan and South Korea. (cont'd)
NORTH KOREAN THREAT HIGHLIGHTS U.S. HYPOCRISY, DISMAL FAILURE OF DIPLOMACY BY BUSH ADMINISTRATION
"Once again, as with Iran, we have a potentially nuclear-armed adversary seeking direct talks with the U.S. government, and once again the Bush Administration refuses to hold such talks," said Kevin Martin, Executive Director of Peace Action Education Fund. "Does Bush know what the word 'diplomacy' means? How can he say he is taking all possible steps to prevent conflicts, and yet adamantly refuse the most basic step, which is to talk, without preconditions, to one's adversary?" (cont'd)
STATEMENT ON THE NORTH KOREAN NUCLEAR WEAPON TEST
The test explosion of a nuclear weapon, announced today by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, was an irresponsible and dangerous action that can only be seen as a giant step backward for the people of North Korea and for the entire North Asian region. The government of Kim Jong Il has undermined the stability of the region and has jeopardized the security and well being of its own people, who may now suffer the repercussions of an outraged and anxious international community. (cont'd)
Resources from the NTI by the Center for Non Proliferatoin Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies. http://www.nti.org/e_research/e3_special_northkorea.html?tr=y&auid=2057191
Petition from Council for a Livable World. http://www.clw.org/action/petitions/northkorea
Iran — Peace Action supports calls for a nuclear-free Middle East
(ANOTHER) WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER

By Melissa Van
This week marks the 25th anniversary of the Israeli bombing of Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor. It would be a terrible idea for Israel, an unacknowledged nuclear state with perhaps as many as 400 nuclear warheads, or the US, to invoke that precedent and take or even threaten similar action against Iran's nuclear facilities.
(Full Article at CommonDreams.org)
IRAN: BUSH ISOLATED, UNDER PRESSURE, TRIES TO TALK THE TALK WITHOUT WALKING THE WALK
By Phyllis Bennis
Institute for Policy Studies

-- The Bush administration's "offer" to join direct talks with Iran reflects Washington's international isolation on the Iran issue; the offer itself is simultaneously very significant and entirely fake.
--The U.S. is still trying to ratchet up international pressure against Iran - proposing an "antimissile shield" for Europe, still threatening a return to the UN Security Council and calling for a "coalition" to impose economic sanctions - but the split between the U.S. and Europe is rising, and the Bush administration looks increasingly desperate.
(Continued)
See Iranbodycount's geopolitical map of Iran
IRAN FACTSHEET
Related links:
Blogging from Bagdhad, An Iraqi Woman's Jounal.
Cost of War and an Iraq Exit Strategy by Phyllis Bennis and Erik Leaver of the Institute of Policy Studies.
A map of Iraq with U.S. permanent bases

www.mnftiu.cc
Energy Security Report from our friends at the GRACE Policy Institute after the G-8 summit in St. Petersburg, Russia
Report1
Report2
Ask your Congressmember to join a parliamentarians global nuclear disarmament network
Dear Friends,
The Parliamentary Network for Nuclear Disarmament has written a letter to every member of the US Congress, requesting each one of them to join their Network. A copy of the invitation is attached below. PNND provides a variety of forums--including conferences, newsletters, seminars, briefings and contacts with parliamentary colleagues--to enable national legislators to learn from each other and collaborate nationally and internationally to prevent nuclear proliferation and further the cause of nuclear disarmament. It also works with the Mayors for Peace Campaign to enroll members of parliaments and Congress into the network and develop national and international strategies to prevent a nuclear disaster. As we do our legislative action work, I urge you to print out a copy of this letter and bring it to your member of Congress, asking them to join this network. Since the Bush administration is actually provoking nuclear proliferation and possible nuclear war, it is even more critical that we establish a force for nuclear disarmament in the Congress--by enrolling members in the PNND network so the will receive regular updates on nuclear issues, a newsletter, and access to a website with proposed joint actions for parliaments across the world. See www.pnnd.org In Europe, for example, parliamentarians in the Belgian Senate have passed a resolution calling on the US to remove its NATO nukes from Belgium.
We need follow up calls and visits on the letter that has been sent below. Please be sure to bring a copy with you the next time you visit your Congressional office. Please let me know if there is anything further you need. And please keep me posted if any of your members agree to sign on. Many thanks. Peace, Alice Slater
Alice Slater
GRACE Policy Institute
28 West. 44 St., Room 1506
New York, NY 10036
212-404-2100 (tel)
212-404-2105(fax)

www.gracelinks.org
Related links:
www.ananuclear.org
Iranbodycount.org
NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION FACT SHEET
From Peace Action New York State
Eight states have successfully detonated nuclear weapons. Under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), five of these states - U.S., Russia, China, Britain and France - are considered "nuclear weapon states" The other three states - India, Pakistan and N. Korea - are non-signatory states and are not bound by internationally accepted safeguards....
Fact Sheet